After wrestling to come to terms with how the translators of the Hebrew Scriptures into Greek used the Greek word, "hope", I'm now turning to how the early church authors of the Christian Scriptures used it. Right out of the gate, I'm surprised.
Matthew only uses it once, and that's a quote of Isaiah 42:4, the Greek version. Mark doesn't use it at all, and John uses it once in a scary quote of Jesus in John 5:45. That leaves Luke, who uses it 3 times. So, throughout all four Gospels, hope is used a total of 5 times in three of the four books. And yet, we refer to Christianity as a "religion of hope". How can that be when the accounts of our Founder are so devoid of the word itself?
Of course, this is being written and posted to the internet, and therefore must be true (eye-roll). We already know to be skeptical of anything we read on the internet (or should be by now). Anyone can truly say anything, and be posted right alongside trusted sources of news (like Reuters).
Having said that, I can (but won't) go into the Greek text I chose for my search. I could put you to sleep (if I haven't already) with the methodology I used to sift through the results. Yawn, "show me the money!" But we want results, we want to see it, not just hear about it. Why is Christianity a religion of hope with so little usage of the word in the accounts of Jesus? Because He demonstrated hope.
Paul use the word extensively. It's crazy how often he uses it. Why so much? Because he is explaining the meaning behind what Jesus did and taught. when we examine what Jesus did and taught, we have hope. It's the natural result. Here's an example that lacks the word, but results in the experience of hope:
Early in the morning He came again into the temple, and all the people were coming to Him; and He sat down and began to teach them. The scribes and the Pharisees brought a woman caught in adultery, and having set her in the center of the court, they said to Him, "Teacher, this woman has been caught in adultery, in the very act. Now in the Law Moses commanded us to stone such women; what then do You say?" (John 8:2-5 NASB)
The situation is "hopeless" for the woman caught in adultery. And which of us has not been caught in a sin against our Creator? In a very real sense, our experience in this life is as the woman, dragged out in public, humiliated by our crimes against our Savior. So, we begin with hopelessness, and then comes the hope:
They were saying this, testing Him, so that they might have grounds for accusing Him. But Jesus stooped down and with His finger wrote on the ground. But when they persisted in asking Him, He straightened up, and said to them, "He who is without sin among you, let him be the first to throw a stone at her." (John 8:6-7 NASB)
People speculate about what Jesus wrote in the dirt, but I don't think that's the point. I doubt many in the crowd would have been able to see anything other than that Jesus picks that point in time to doodle in the dust. I think it may have been a more dismissive act than anything else. His response bears this out, "He who is without sin among you, let him be the first to throw a stone at her." See, the thing is, it's easy to point fingers and accuse. Our enemy, the devil, is named accuser, that's what "Satan" means. But accusing one another misses the hope which underlies the good news of Jesus.
Again He stooped down and wrote on the ground. When they heard it, they began to go out one by one, beginning with the older ones, and He was left alone, and the woman, where she was, in the center of the court. Straightening up, Jesus said to her, "Woman, where are they? Did no one condemn you?" She said, "No one, Lord." And Jesus said, "I do not condemn you, either. Go. From now on sin no more." (John 8:8-11 NASB)
Jesus simply waits. The lesson sinks in, and the crowd disperses, a crowd which probably included a man straightening his tunic (where was the man caught in the "very act"?). Jesus now turns to the woman, the one without hope. No one is left to accuse? Then neither does He, but He tells her to change her behavior. Jesus calls out the behavior, but refuses to condemn the woman having behaved that way. We're never told what happened to her, legends speculate, but we're never told. What we're left with, as we see ourselves as the woman, is hope.
In this account, hope provides the room to change, the space to be different, and the motivation to focus on a new devotion, one to our Savior. The scene, the story, is full of hope, but hope is never mentioned. The good news of Jesus is also full of hope, regardless of whether we use the word.
We can read through any, or all, of the Gospels and use hope as the perspective from which we ask questions, and observe the scenes. "How did this event give hope to the people who experienced it?" "How did the audience of the writer gain hope from this account?" "Where is the hope for me in this account?" It's a progression in meaning, depth, and experience of hope.
So, where do you gain hope from this account of Jesus?
Scripture quotations taken from the NASB. Copyright by The Lockman Foundation